AI isn’t coming for your job. It is coming for your workflow.
That distinction matters, especially for ISPs. Most teams I know aren’t short on effort or expertise. They’re short on time. AI is showing up as a lever that gives someof that time back—if you apply it in the right places, with the rightguardrails.In this episode of Bandwidth, we stayed out of the “someday” conversation and focused onwhat operators are actually doing right now: where AI is saving minutes thatbecome hours, where it’s improving reliability, and where it can quietly createnew problems if you treat it like a set-and-forget tool.
Bandwidth is sponsored by Sonar, but the goal of the show is simple: share what’s working in the real world for the folks building and running networks.
The lowest-friction wins are the ones that don’t require specialized data or custom integrations:
That last one is bigger than it sounds. “Weeks of research” turning into “a day of review” changes how fast you can make decisions—especially when you’re balancing operations, growth, and the usual fires.
The key: treat AI like a fast first draft plus a faster search assistant. You still own the final output.
Georgette called out the industry-specific shift we’re seeing: AI going beyond “chatbot on the website” and into the heart of the support operation.
Examples that are landing well:
The big unlock isn’t that AI “replaces a CSR.” It’s that it shortens the time to context. Support improves when the person helping the customer doesn’t have to hunt through five systems and three browser tabs to figure out what’s going on.
Routing optimization is not glamorous, but it hits real costs:
Static data(office location, service address) plus changing conditions (traffic, weather,constraints) is a good fit for AI-driven optimization. That’s not science fiction. Operators are already testing it because the ROI is measurable.
This came up because it’s real. Small operators often feel like there’s no margin anywhere.
But when teams say “we don’t have time,” what I hear is: “We don’t have a plan.”
A plan doesn’t mean an eight-hour training day. It can be:
The point is consistency.
If leadership wants AI adoption, leadership has to participate. It doesn’t work when the message is, “You all go figure this out.” That approach creates uneven adoption, uneven risk, and very uneven results.
The uncomfortable part: some operators can’t get to the bigger AI wins because their data foundation isn’t ready.
If you’re notlogging tickets, if support is still operating off informal notes, if accounthistory isn’t structured—then AI can’t correlate what it needs to correlate.
That doesn’t mean you wait.
It means you“plant a flag” and start collecting clean data going forward:
Even if your historical data is a mess, your next 90 days don’t have to be. And those next 90 days become the base layer for everything you want to do later.
In the episode, we kept circling back to churn for a reason: it’s where AI’s strengths line upwith ISP business reality.
AI is good atpattern analysis—finding signals that are too subtle or too spread out forhumans to reliably catch early. Churn is a pattern problem.
And churn is expensive:
Fraud detection matters too, but for most Tier 2/3 ISPs, the immediate business impact of churn is usually bigger than the typical fraud hit. As you scale, fraud risk grows. But churn is the steady leak that flips the boat over slowly.
If you’re choosing one direction to point your energy first, churn is a strong place to start.
This is the part that can’t be skipped.
If you’re putting any customer, network, billing, or internal operational details into a model,it needs to be under corporate control.
Even with anonymization, “oops” happens. And “oops” with customer data is not the kind ofstory you want to tell.
Corporate accounts also make it easier to:
Policy sounds boring until you need it. You need something that covers:
This also helps with training because you’re not asking teams to guess what “safe” looks like.
One of the best ideas we talked about: regular internal sessions where teams share:
This does two things:
We hit this in the “Love it or hate it” segment, and the nuance matters.
Screening: AI can be useful to remove obvious non-starters (wrong location, missing required certifications, etc.). It can shrink the pile.
Vetting: AI is still likely to miss great “fringe” candidates—people who don’t look perfect on paper but are strong problem-solvers, curious, and great in the role.
My concern is simple: if you lean too hard on AI early, you’ll optimize for “good resumewriters” and filter out the people you’d be happiest you hired six months from now.
Use AI to reduce noise. Don’t use it to decide who has grit.
This hypothetical made all of us tense for a reason.
If a chatbot is closing tickets faster but frustrating customers, you’re watching a bad trade happen in real time. That frustration doesn’t stay inside the support queue. It shows up as:
The fix is not“turn it off forever.” The fix is operational discipline:
If you don’t measure satisfaction the same way you measure your human team, you’re guessing.
Is it:
One of the smartest rollout approaches we discussed: enable the chatbot only during office hours for an initial period (90 days was the example), so staff can monitor outcomes, catch failures, and adjust before it becomes 24/7.
That’s the right instinct: you keep control while the system learns and while your customers learn how to use it.
If you want something practical to take back to your team, here’s a straightforward sequence:
AI moves fast. Your plan will change. That’s normal.
What you can’t do is sit idle while the gap widens between operators who are learning in public and operators who are still waiting for the “right time.”
The episode is available in the blog post with links out to Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and the Bandwidth YouTube channel.